We can get the United States out of Iraq quickly and not give the mid-east as a gift to the Iranians. We can solve the problems of most of that part of the world quickly and with very little effort on the part of the United States. All that the United States Government has to do is move toward a policy of supporting regime change –

IN ISRAEL!

We all know that Israel is the roadblock to Peace in the Middle East, or at least the current Government in Israel is. We all know that whenever the United States gets to talking with any Arab government or NGO (Most Arab NGO’s are terrorists or terrorist front organizations), eventually the Arab side says that the Arab-Israel Problem has to be settled first. We all know that since before the turn of the last century, the Arab-Jewish problem has festered somewhat. We all know that several times this “problem” has broken out into open hostilities, and each time those hostilities have been stopped by outside forces. We all know that each cease-fire has ended with renewed hostilities, and never with real peace.

We know that the current government in Jerusalem has bartered away land and position, much of it not really the government’s to barter away. The government of Israel has been more than an appeaser of a terrorist [non-]State, it has been an enabler of the terrorist NGOs of the PA, Hamas, Hissballer, and others. As a matter of fact, when the rest of the world, including the reluctant EU refused to process payments or talk to the PA or its representatives, the current government of Israel “released" millions of $$$$ [USD] to the PA and has been negotiating massive prisoner releases and land transfers. All of these releases of funds, murderers and land, come with no promise of any kind of quid pro quo from the PA. If this is not appeasement and enablement, I am willing to nominate Chamberlain for the Noble Peace Prize.

HERE IS MY PLAN

The United States government should actively support local Israeli parties to effect a regime change in Israel. The United States should back any popular democratic movement which promises to restore Israel’s rightful rule over all the territories of Israel including the areas known as “the Gaza Strip” and “the West Bank” [of the Jordan River]. The government of the United States should help those nationalist popular democratic parties to accomplish “all that is required to assert Israel’s rule and stability over those areas.” The United States Government and the new Israel government should not fail to point out when necessary that Israel has had Arab Moslems living peacefully within its temporary borders since the declaration of Israel’s Statehood in 1948,

The new regime in Israel will surely agree to not follow the PA format of “ethnic cleansing” which the PA perpetrated on the Gaza Strip as well as those areas under PA governance in Judea and Samaria, a.k.a. The West Bank, but might offer compensation for those current residents who would rather leave Israel than live under Israel’s rule.

Once the Arab War Against Israel is concluded through proper peace treaties, possibly after a conflict which is allowed to conclude without foreign intervention, that issue will be off the table and the United States will be able to negotiate with any and all Arab States and NGOs without having “that” issue come into the negotiations like the multi-megaton elephant it is.

Part of my solution is that some of the other parts of the “problems of the region,” will solve themselves with a sub-nuclear conflict between the parties directly engaged in the “negotiations” (with or without guns).

I propose that within months after President Bush withdraws his support for the fallacious “two State Solution” and the “road map” to nowhere, the parties will negotiate with greater urgency. I further propose that within a year after the successful termination of hostilities between Israel and its enemies, there will be no need for the United States to station troops in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, or Afghanistan.

It is time for a new direction in the United States Middle East Policy, and that direction requires considering Victory as an option.

A border is a line of demarcation between two political entities. The long-standing conventions regarding borders include but are not limited to such things as criminal and civil jurisdiction within borders, and the right of granting and collaterally of denying entry and in some cases even exit across borders.

Since the close of hostilities between the rebellious colonies and Great Britain, the United States has had clearly demarked, although often changing borders. Often, a few Americans would cross into areas held by either another sovereign state or by some band or bands of indigenous people, and they would petition for annexation to the United States. Sometimes the government of the United States would buy property held by other sovereign states, and annex them. Occasionally, the United States would wage war, either with the idea of annexing further territories or with the consequences of annexation by conquest.

No American President would ever have dreamed of having the United States exist for even one day without a clearly defined border; until the current administration. The current administration appears quite happy with a southern border which is being crossed by whoever cares to, whenever they care to. If that isn’t tragic enough, the northern border is even less secure, and is subject to massive crossings without a single complaint, capture, chase, or even inquiry into who might have crossed or why.

An administration that is so clearly willing to forgo the sanctity of its own borders for whatever reason it might have is not who I would think has a right to counsel a country that has been denied an official internationally binding border from its [current] inception. The Secretary of State would do better explaining to the residents of New Mexico, Texas, and California about the humanitarian rights of the Mexican people as they cross illegally, (without official permission, if you prefer), than to counsel Israel as to the humanitarian rights of the “Palestinian People,” who wish to enter Israel to kill and maim and conquer rather than merely just to “enjoy the good life” that the United States affords its citizens.

To put it succinctly, Ms. Rice, “Shut up and go home!” The so-called “Palestinian People” are the creation of perfidious do-gooders like James Earl Carter, (Y’Makh Shmo V’Zikhro), and others in or near power in the United States going back as far as President Roosevelt. I remember the St. Louis!

If all of you nice people would stop giving aid and comfort to the enemy, you could not only settle the Arab War Against Israel, but could also win the War against Islamic Terrorists. Despite all of this, I am sorry to report that there will still be another generation, at least, of children now being indoctrinated in a culture of hatred and suicide, funded at least partially by the United States and largely by the United Nations, and the EU.

The American inability to speak any language other than English allows others to put whatever words they chose into the mouths of American characters, as long as it isn’t in English. The DNC proved that when they invited a Moslem Cleric to open their meeting with a prayer which asked Allah to bring the United States under Islamic Rule; this at a time when Christian Chaplains are being rebuked for praying “in Jesus’ Name.”